Each asset tagging technology offers unique benefits depending on how and where you need to track items.
Here’s a quick comparison of how common options stack up:
Barcode labels
Best for: Standard inventory and asset tracking.
Pros: Inexpensive, widely supported, easy to print and scan.
Cons: Require direct line of sight; scanning is one-by-one; easily damaged or obscured.
QR code tags
Best for: Mobile-friendly applications and linking to detailed item data.
Pros: Scannable with smartphones; easy to deploy; no need for specialized scanners.
Cons: Must be scanned close-up; not suitable for high-speed or bulk scanning.
RFID tags
Best for: Fast, contactless scanning across large inventories.
Pros: No line of sight needed; supports bulk scanning; great for automation.
Cons: Higher cost; requires RFID readers and infrastructure.
NFC, GPS, and BLE tags
These technologies support other forms of asset interaction or real-time tracking. NFC offers secure tap-to-access functionality, GPS enables location tracking over long distances, and BLE provides proximity-based awareness indoors. While RedBeam doesn’t support these methods, they may be useful in highly specialized scenarios – like those requiring real-time geo-tracking or mobile interactivity.
Bonus tip: Technology aside, don’t overlook tag construction. Metal tags are built for harsh environments, tamper-evident labels improve security, and industry-specific formats – like UID labels or rack tags – can help you meet compliance needs or streamline operations.
RedBeam supports all 1D (barcode), 2D (QR code), and RFID-enabled asset tracking, giving you flexibility to balance cost, performance, and scalability.